top of page

The Return to Office Mandates - Are They Necessary or Just a Desire of Control?

This discussion about having the offices full again, bustling with people, was happening in the last three years at least twice a year.

The companies asked their employees to return to the office, while the employees weren't that willing to renounce their gained freedom, and there we have two parties in opposite positions, each trying to win this "battle".

Return-to-office mandates have become a topic of significant discussion, as they come with benefits and potential consequences - employers are threatened with lay-offs. At the same time, employees announce their resignations, and neither seem willing to give up the fight.

In this piece, we will explore the consequences of return-to-office mandates and the considerations organisations should consider when asking their employees to be physically present in their offices.


1. Employee Well-being and Morale:

One of the most significant consequences of return-to-office mandates is the impact on employee well-being and morale. After years of remote or hybrid work, employees have become accustomed to the flexibility and convenience of working from home. They felt they finally had more time for their families and themselves instead of spending that time in traffic, commuting to work.

Also, it should be taken into consideration that introverts recharged themselves in the intimacy of their homes and gained their "me-time" while working from home, so asking them to work again from a crowded office could be harmful to their mental health.

Another category that needed work-from-home flexibility was the parents and the caregivers, who needed to find other (more costly) arrangements to take care of their families.

So, forcing employees to return to the office can decrease job satisfaction and morale.

Employers must prioritise the health and well-being of their workforce while considering alternative work arrangements, such as hybrid or flexible schedules, to maintain employee satisfaction.


2. Productivity and Performance: Another consequence of return-to-office mandates is the potential impact on productivity and performance. Remote work has shown that employees can be just as productive, if not more when given the flexibility to work from home. After proving that work could be done efficiently from anywhere, they need help understanding why they are forced to perform the work they perform better from their homes or the nearby cafe in an office.

Returning to the office may disrupt established routines and work-life balance, affecting productivity.

Also, working remotely - because it should be "work from anywhere" instead of "working from home" - allowed employees to feel more empowered and gain work autonomy instead of being micromanaged from the office.

On this matter, organisations should carefully evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of returning to the office and consider implementing a phased approach to allow employees to adjust and maintain productivity.


3. Commuting and Environmental Impact: Return to office mandates bring back the need for daily commuting, which has consequences. Commuting can lead to increased stress, longer working hours, and reduced personal time.

Some people commute for more than three hours daily to do work that could be done from anywhere, reducing their personal time with lengthy that could be done from anywhere, reducing their time with lengthy hours. Additionally, the environmental impact of commuting, including traffic congestion and carbon emissions, should be considered.

To mitigate these consequences, employers can explore alternatives such as flexible work hours and offering remote work options.


4. Talent Retention and Recruitment: Return to office mandates can affect talent retention and recruitment efforts. Some employees may prefer the flexibility of remote work and seek opportunities that align with their chosen work arrangements.

Organisations that are inflexible in their approach to returning to the office may experience challenges in attracting and retaining top talent. Many employees feel that they lose their autonomy being forced to work in an office again, so they might leave their current job for a more flexible one or to start an entrepreneurial initiative.

Employers must consider the evolving expectations and preferences of the workforce and adapt their policies accordingly.







Return-to-office mandates have far-reaching consequences that organisations must carefully consider. Prioritising employee well-being, maintaining productivity, addressing commuting challenges, ensuring workplace safety, and adapting to changing workforce expectations are critical to implementing a return-to-office strategy.

By balancing organisational needs and employee preferences, organisations can navigate this transition effectively and create a thriving work environment in the post-pandemic era.

4 views0 comments

Commentaires


bottom of page